A class-action lawsuit filed in Nevada federal court challenges IGT's popular Wheel of Fortune slot machines, claiming they deceive players through their bonus-wheel mechanism.

The lawsuit alleges that players are misled into believing they have equal chances of landing on any segment of the bonus wheel, similar to a mechanical roulette wheel. Instead, the outcome is predetermined by an internal computer programmed to favor lower monetary amounts.

Four former players filed the suit against IGT and casino operators including MGM Resorts, Bally's Corp, and Penn Entertainment. They argue that the game's association with the TV show falsely suggests random chance probabilities similar to the show's wheel.

Key points about Wheel of Fortune slots:

• Uses a Random Number Generator (RNG) to determine outcomes
• Each wheel segment has different predetermined odds of being hit
• Players have equal chances against each other, but not equal odds for each prize
• Machines must maintain specific Return to Player (RTP) percentages
• Gaming regulators approve all RNGs and game codes
• Casinos cannot modify RTPs without regulatory approval

The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages for all Wheel of Fortune players at the named casinos and an injunction to stop the games' operation.

Legal experts note that since Nevada has legalized and regulated slot machines through the Nevada Gaming Commission, the lawsuit may face significant challenges in federal court.

Related Articles

Previous Articles